Page 134 - Navy Journal 219
P. 134
Navy Journal 2019
correlate the established theory of risk mitigation. The most successful risk
management practice to date is ‘Boehm’s six step of risk management
framework’. Analyzing this software RM technique the inherent risk factors of
unrealistic scheduling, developing wrong software functions, and developing
wrong user interface has been correlated with BN software development
projects. Accordingly, the risk management techniques are discussed to mitigate
these risk factors.
However, throughout this process the most interesting thing found is the
requirement of awareness build up among the users of BN on software
development life cycle. Knowledge on the software development process might
yield considerable amount of mitigation of risk factors. Hence, the first and
foremost thing in this regard is to build understanding among the users and
practitioners of BN on the process of software development and then gradually
the technique of RM can be embedded with our own style of software
development life cycle. Our final goal is to maximize naval strategic and
operational process by improving the project management technique, which is
possible only when we understand the value of software development project.
Bibliography
1. Barki, H., Rivard, S., & Talbot, J. (1993). Toward and Assessment of Software
Development Risk. Journal of Management Information Systems , 203-219
2. Boehm, B. (1989). Software Risk Management. ESEC'89: 2nd European
Software Engineering Conference (pp. 1-19). Coventry, UK: Springer- Verleg
3. Boehm, B. (1991). Software Risk Management: Principles and Practices. The
Premier Electronics Industry Conference of the Northwest (pp. 32-40). Portland:
Northcon/@91
4. Charette, R. N. (2005). Why Software Fails. NA: IEEE Spectrum
5. Gantz, J. F., Christiansen, C. A., & Gillen, A. (2006). The Risks of Obtaining
and Using Pirated Software. IDC White Paper , 1-12
6. Goertzel, K. M., & Feldman, L. (2009). Software Survivability: Where Safety
and Security Converge. Seatle: American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics, Inc
126

